Legal Opinion

Frey v. Ramsey County Community Human Services

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1994No. C9-93-2474PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Cynthia Frey challenges the trial court’s summary judgment holding that Frey cannot pursue her claim for discriminatory refusal to renew a contract for provision of emergency shelter care because evidence acquired after the nonrenewal shows Frey was not qualified to be an emergency shelter care provider. We affirm.

FACTS

Cynthia Frey became a licensed foster care provider in Ramsey County (the county) in August of 1987. After initially providing respite care, Frey began providing substitute emergency shelter care in 1989. In 1990 and 1991, Frey entered into contracts with…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. V. Ray Summers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heating & Air Specialists, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. PFS DISTRIBUTION CO. v. RaduechelDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
  3. DeJong v. City of Sioux CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  4. Tiberi v. Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Meads v. Best Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API