Legal Opinion
PFS DISTRIBUTION CO. v. Raduechel
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided August 9, 2005No. CIV.4:04 CV 10329PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LONGSTAFF, Chief Judge.
On or about February 7, 2005, plaintiff PFS Distribution Company (“PFS”) filed a motion to dismiss defendant Raduechel’s counterclaim. Defendant Darrell Radue-chel resisted the motion February 24, and plaintiff filed a reply memorandum on March 8, 2005.
In addition, on April 19, 2005, Raduechel filed a Rule 11 motion for sanctions. PFS resisted the motion on May 6, 2005. Both motions are fully submitted.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts leading up to this action were set forth in detail in this Court’s August II, 2004 Order granting plaintiffs motion for a preliminary…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Estate of Rosenberg ex rel. Rosenberg v. CrandellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Kohl v. CassonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Phipps v. IASD Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marcie Guerrero v. J.W. Hutton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Beganovic v. Tyson Fresh Meats, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023
- Marcie Guerrero v. J. W. Hutton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Marcie Guerrero v. J.W. Hutton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006