Legal Opinion
In Re Jesse M.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 8, 2007No. 1 CA-MH 07-0002PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 Jesse challenges the order involuntarily committing him for treatment based on the superior court’s determination that he suffered from a serious mental disorder and needed in-patient treatment. Specifically, he contends the court erred when it refused to allow him to represent himself at the involuntary commitment hearing and when the court directed the court reporter to stop transcribing the proceedings.
FACTUAL 1 AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Jesse was arrested on October 5, 2006, for allegedly threatening his parents and was psyehiatrically evaluated in jail. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Doremus v. FarrellDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1975
- Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re MH 2007-001236Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In re S.M.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
- In re MH 2008-000438Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In re MH 2007-001264Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In Re Mh2011-000914Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.