Legal Opinion

Parham v. J. R.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 1979No. 75-1690PublishedCited by 917 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

The question presented in this appeal is what process is constitutionally due a minor child whose parents or guardian seek state administered institutional mental health care for the child and specifically whether an adversary proceeding is required prior to or after the commitment.

I(a) Appellee 1 J. R., a child being treated in a Georgia state mental hospital, was a plaintiff in this class action2 based on 42 U. S. C. § 1983, in the District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. Appellants are the State’s Commissioner *588of the Department of Human Resources, the Director of the Mental…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by917 opinions

  1. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

912 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API