Wallis v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
— The Board of Governors of The State Bar has recommended that the petitioner be suspended from the practice of law because, in borrowing money from a former client, he committed acts involving moral turpitude and dishonesty. In his petition to review this determination, the petitioner charges generally that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the findings against him. He maintains that his difficulties are the outcome of unprofitable business ventures undertaken in good faith which do not come within the purview of the State Bar Act. (Ch. 4, Bus. & Prof. Code.)
The complaining…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Lantz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re SoaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Fitzpatrick v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Wagner v. WoodwardMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Hunniecutt v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Wayne v. Bureau of Private Investigators & AdjustersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.