Legal Opinion

Hunniecutt v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1988No. S.F. 25134PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*366Opinion

THE COURT.

In this proceeding we review the recommendation of the State Bar of California that petitioner Robert Lewis Hunniecutt be suspended from the practice of law for three years, that execution of suspension be stayed, and that petitioner be placed on probation for five years on conditions which include actual suspension for ninety days and until restitution has been made.

The recommendation is based on findings that petitioner abandoned clients in two matters and violated the State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct, rule 5-101,1 which governs business transactions with clients, in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Beery v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jackson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. David Welch Co. v. Erskine & TulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. In Re ImmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. BattistelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rose v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Levin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API