Snow v. Snow
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Anoka county by plaintiff John Snow, 'to determine the adverse claims of defendants Orin Snow and Kate •Snow, his wife, to certain land in possession of plaintiff. Defendant Kate Snow alone appeared and answered, alleging title in her husband. The case was tried before Giddings, J., who found in favor of defendants. From an order granting a motion for a new trial, defendant Kate Snow appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
.EEWIS, J.
Action to quiet title to certain land. The answer of appellant, Kate -Snow, alleges that she is the wife of defendant Orin Snow and that respondent, John Snow, is the son of Orin Snow by a former marriage ; denies that respondent was ever in possession of the land, except by virtue of a lease or leases from Orin Snow; and alleges the title to be in her husband. The trial court found that defendant Orin Snow was the owner of the real estate involved, and ordered judgment that respondent take nothing and for dismissal of the action. Subsequently, upon motion of respondent, the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anson v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bright v. BrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Slingerland v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Jorgenson v. JorgensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Ferguson v. TrovatenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trebesch v. TrebeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Happel v. HappelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Chapel v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Evenson v. AamodtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.