Legal Opinion
Poeppel v. Hartford Life Insurance
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 4, 2003No. CIV.A. 6:01-2880-25PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WOOTEN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this case, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant unlawfully denied her benefits as a beneficiary under an employee benefit plan insuring her brother, Randall D. Du-vall (“Duvall”). 1 The defendant denies these allegations and has filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. # 18). The plaintiff opposes the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
This matter is now before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (“the Report”) filed by United States Magistrate Judge William M. Catoe, to whom this case had previously been assigned…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- LaAsmar v. Phelps Dodge Corp. Life, Accidental Death & Dismemberment & Dependent Life Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Sawyer v. Potash Corp. of SaskatchewanDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Danouvong v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Poeppel v. Hartford InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Stamp v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.