Legal Opinion
Stamp v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided December 13, 2006No. C.A. 04-488LPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b). On one side, Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), Administrator-Benefits, Exxon Mobil Benefit Plan, Exxon Mobil Benefit Plan, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Life Insurance Protection Plan of Mobil Oil Corporation, Life Insurance Plan of Mobil Oil 1 (collectively, “Mobil”) jointly move for summary judgment. On the other side, Plaintiff Karen Stamp simultaneously objects to Defendants’ Motion and moves…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kovach v. Zurich American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Lennon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- McGillivray v. Life Ins. Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Frame v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- Caldwell v. UNUM Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.