Vance v. Schulder
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Justice.
The principal issue in this Court is the appropriate statute of limitations applicable to a suit based upon alleged fraudulent representations said to have induced the sale of stock for less than its value.
The five (5) individual defendants were the directors of Hartsville Manufacturing Corporation and of Consolidated Merchandising Corporation. Defendants owned substantially all of the stock of Consolidated Merchandising Corporation and ninety (90%) percent of the stock of Hartsville. Plaintiff, Woodson Vance, owned ten (10%) percent of the stock of Hartsville. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wallace v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Bodne v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
- Commerce Oil Refining Corporation v. MinerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
- Hall v. De SaussureCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Dorothy Johnson v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Whaley v. PerkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Benton v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.