Legal Opinion
Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Canby Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 17, 1933No. 29,518PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEVANEY, Chief Justice.
The defendant Canby Investment Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Canby company, is, and at all times important to the determination of this action has been, the owner of a certain tract of agricultural land situated in Lincoln county, Minnesota. The property is subject to a valid first mortgage, not given to secure any part of the purchase price, executed in 1925 and at present held by the plaintiff in this action. Under the terms of the mortgage defendant Canby company is bound to pay the taxes, insurance, and any assessments levied against the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Cullen v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Strangeway v. EisenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Anderson v. ListonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Ludlum v. RothschildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Larson v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- G.G.C. Co. v. First National Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Piche v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- In Re Pavilion Place AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.