Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Liston

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1897No. Nos. 10,533—(108)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Polk county, entered pursuant to the order of Ives, J., and from an order refusing- to make amended findings.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a chattel mortgage, and to determine certain adverse claims to the mortgaged property. Several persons were defendants or intervenors, all of whom are out of the case except the defendant Wallis, the contest now being entirely between him and plaintiff. Hence many of the findings of fact, and all of the conclusions of law except the first two, are wholly irrelevant to this appeal.

The defendant Wallis, being in the lawful possession of a half section of land, entered into a contract (Exhibit J) with one Liston for the farming of the land “on shares” by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Strangeway v. EisenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Iron Store Co. v. BranumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Kenneally v. Standard Electronics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. Jefferson County Bank v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Canby Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API