Strangeway v. Eisenman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Olmsted county, Gould, J., refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action to recover possession of a number of stacks of grain, a quantity of timothy in the shock, and 10 acres of standing corn, being all the crops sown and grown, and then situated, in 189G, on a farm owned by the plaintiff.
In 1894 the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract, Exhibit A of the record, for the cultivation by the latter of the farm on shares *396for a term of years. The material terms of this contract were as follows: The defendant was to till and farm the land in the usual course of husbandry, and was to plant it in such crops as the plaintiff should direct;…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Porter v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by23 opinions
- Larson v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Minneapolis Iron Store Co. v. BranumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Anderson v. ListonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Cook-Reynolds Co. v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.