Ludlum v. Rothschild
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Young, J., and. verdict directed for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action to recover damages for the wrongful conversion of certain personal property, consisting of the fixtures- and furniture in a building in the city of Minneapolis occupied as a saloon. Both parties claim under one Elkan. In 1886, plaintiff, the-owner of the building, rented to Elkan for the term of 15 years at a yearly rental of $3,600, payable $300 a month in advance. The-*219lease contained various covenants on the part of Elkan, also a provision that if any of these covenants should not be kept by him the plaintiff might cancel and annul the lease, and re-enter. The instrument,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mitchell v. WinslowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1843
- Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. MaginnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Miller v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
3Cited by21 opinions
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. WitmireCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Barron v. San Angelo Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Hogan v. Atlantic Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Leitch v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Canby Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.