Legal Opinion

People v. Mooney

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1983No. Crim. 13817PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

Convicted of burgling a motor vehicle (Pen. Code, § 459), Ronald. James Mooney claims he was prejudiced by the court refusing his request to instruct the jury auto tampering (Veh. Code, § 10852) is a lesser included offense of that crime. We reverse because, on the facts of this case, ,the trial court should have given the requested instruction.

Factual Background

Caroline Sue Clark drove her Dodge van to the parking lot of the Torrey Pines Golf Course where, upon exiting, she rolled up the windows and locked all doors.

While Clark was golfing, one person in the foursome noticed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SaldanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. TrimbleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. Young K.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. Lamont R.California Court of Appeal · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API