Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Saldana

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1984No. Docket Nos. 43887, 44974PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FIELDHOUSE, J. *

David Saldana and his brother, Edmundo Saldana, were charged with one count of possession of heroin for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351; count I). David Saldana was also charged in a second count with possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359; count II). The trial was severed and the appellant, David Saldana, was found guilty by a jury as to both counts charged. He was sentenced to state prison to serve a concurrent term of two years on count I and sixteen months on count II.

David contends that the conviction for possession for sale of heroin must…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Donald Alan Miller v. A.A. Stagner and R.L. Pulley, Leroy Freeman v. A.A. Stagner and R.L. PulleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Donald Alan Miller v. A.A. Stagner and R.L. Pulley, Leroy Freeman v. A.A. Stagner and R.L. PulleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. People v. Mooring, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. People v. TinajeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API