Legal Opinion

People v. Young K.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1996No. B100703PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.

J(1) Young K. drove the get-away car for two friends who removed the headlights from a parked car. This resulted in a petition alleging that Young had committed vehicular burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), 1 receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)), and misdemeanor auto tampering (Veh. Code, § 10852). The petition was sustained and Young appeals, contending that “entry into the headlamp housings of an automobile to steal its headlamps” is not an “entry into a vehicle” within the meaning of section 459. We agree.

Discussion

As relevant, section 459 provides that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. NibleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. People v. MacKabeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People v. RavenscroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. GibbonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. People v. ThornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. State Of Louisiana v. Hezzie BickhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API