People v. Young K.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.
J(1) Young K. drove the get-away car for two friends who removed the headlights from a parked car. This resulted in a petition alleging that Young had committed vehicular burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), 1 receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)), and misdemeanor auto tampering (Veh. Code, § 10852). The petition was sustained and Young appeals, contending that “entry into the headlamp housings of an automobile to steal its headlamps” is not an “entry into a vehicle” within the meaning of section 459. We agree.
Discussion
As relevant, section 459 provides that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. NibleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. MacKabeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. RavenscroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. GibbonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- People v. ThornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- State Of Louisiana v. Hezzie BickhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019