Jaggar v. Winslow
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Otter Tail county, McKelvy, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The firm of Tousley & Winslow, of which defendant is surviving partner, purchased an engine and boiler of one Freeman, alleged to have been duly warranted, but to have proved defective. One of the notes given therefor was assigned by Freeman to plaintiff with notice. Suit having been brought thereon, the parties, .including Freeman, entered into negotiations for a settlement, resulting in the execution of the note in suit by defendant, and a contemporaneous agreement between Freeman and defendant in respect to the repair of the boiler. The note purported to be “for value received, and in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Townsend v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Stark v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Peterson v. WoollenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Pieh v. FlittonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927