Bowden v. Burnham
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. At Law. Action by James K. Burnham and others, doing business under the firm name of Burnham, Hanna, Hunger & Co., against A. S. Bowden and B. A. Bowden, individually, and as partners under the name of Bowden Bros. An attachment was levied on defendants’ property, and thereupon Barnes, Brown & Denton intervened, claiming an interest in the property as mortgagees.
Read the full summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. At Law. Action by James K. Burnham and others, doing business under the firm name of Burnham, Hanna, Hunger & Co., against A. S. Bowden and B. A. Bowden, individually, and as partners under the name of Bowden Bros. An attachment was levied on defendants’ property, and thereupon Barnes, Brown & Denton intervened, claiming an interest in the property as mortgagees. The issues arising on the intervention were tried with the other issues in the action, before the court, a jury having been waived, and judgment was…
1Opinion of the Court
CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.
The defendants in error, Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co., citizens of the state of Missouri, brought suit by attachment against plaintiffs in error, A. S. Bowden and B. A. Bowden, individually and as partners, citizens of Kansas, on notes and accounts for various sums, amounting in the aggregate to $2,76456, $11.85 of which was due, and .the balance not due. The judge made an order allowing an attachment for the aggregate sum, and the clerk issued the writ accordingly. As to some of the notes and accounts sued on, the plaintiffs sued as assignees. The original complaint…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Tilton v. CofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Whalen v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- In re Plymouth Cordage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Kentucky Life & Acc. Ins. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- Guarantee Co. of North Dakota v. HanwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.