Bank of Santa Fe v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Haskell district court; Wm. Easton Hutchison, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Doster, O. J. :
This is the third time this case has been to this court. (Bank of Banta Fe v. Haskell Co. Bank, 54 Kan. 375, 38 Pac. 485 ; Bank v. Bank, 59 id. 354, 53 Pac. 132.) A brief reference to the facts shown upon the former hearings and a statement of one or two additional matters occurring since then will suffice to present the substantial questions now at issue. The Haskell County Bank was the depositary of the county funds. It was insolvent. On March 2, 1894, it assigned and delivered all its assets to the board of county commissioners as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moline Plow Co. v. RodgersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Dyckman v. SevatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Peterson v. WoollenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Blaker v. MorseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sweet v. Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Ireland v. WaymireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- James v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HenrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Davidson v. McKownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.