Legal Opinion

State v. Erby

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1982No. 8127SC1012PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant is entitled to a new trial. Of numerous assignments of error raised on appeal, all of which have merit, we will limit our discussion to those evidencing obvious error and prejudice to the defendant.

On direct examination of the defendant, he was asked the following question in an effort to offer an explanation as to why he was carrying a gun on the night of the shooting:

Q. All right, and how did it [the gun] come to be in your right front pocket?

A. The night before, we had some trouble down there. Some guys was shooting—

District Attorney: Objection.

COURT:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. SwinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. NorkettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. StarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. BorkarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API