Legal Opinion

State v. Borkar

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 2005No. COA04-1159PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Hemant Raghunath Borkar (“defendant”) appeals from a judgment dated 3 September 2003 entered consistent with a jury verdict finding him guilty of solicitation of murder, stalking, and carrying a concealed weapon. As we find prejudicial error in the trial court’s failure to provide a limiting instruction, we reverse and remand for a new trial. . -

The evidence tends to show that defendant met Tabitha Zimmerman (“Tabitha”) in 1998 when both were first-year students at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine (“Medical School”). Defendant and Tabitha initially had a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. NorkettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. StillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. ErbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API