State v. Borkar
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
Hemant Raghunath Borkar (“defendant”) appeals from a judgment dated 3 September 2003 entered consistent with a jury verdict finding him guilty of solicitation of murder, stalking, and carrying a concealed weapon. As we find prejudicial error in the trial court’s failure to provide a limiting instruction, we reverse and remand for a new trial. . -
The evidence tends to show that defendant met Tabitha Zimmerman (“Tabitha”) in 1998 when both were first-year students at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine (“Medical School”). Defendant and Tabitha initially had a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. NorkettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. StillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. ErbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boyt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010