Legal Opinion

State v. Hollingsworth

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 31, 1985No. 8512SC653PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*579HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence as to each of the charges. He contends that the only substantive evidence submitted at trial which tends to identify defendant as the perpetrator consists of six out-of-court statements allegedly made by his mother, none of which are admissible as exceptions to the hearsay rule. For the reasons set out below, we agree with defendant and reverse.

At trial, the State called as its first witness defendant’s mother, Helen Lyde, who testified that she had taken Valium…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. ErbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LoveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. LeggettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API