Legal Opinion

Donald M. Drake Co. v. Lundmark

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 25, 1983No. 80-04474, 80-03297; CA A22003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*263JOSEPH, C. J.

The issue in this case is which of two successive employers is responsible for compensation for claimant’s back condition. Both denied compensability. The first employer, Fred J. Early Company (Early), contended that the back problem was not the result of an injury incurred during employment with the company. The second, Donald Drake Company (Drake), claimed that the condition resulted from a pre-existing back problem. The referee characterized the condition as an injury incurred during the first employment and held Early responsible. The Board found that the condition was an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. O'NEAL v. Sisters of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Fossum v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smirnoff v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. United Pacific Insurance v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Crowe v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Dynea USA, Inc. v. FairbanksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Morrow v. Pacific UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API