Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Estate of Rich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Appeal from the disallowance of a claim by commissioners. The estate brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

■ Claimant recovered judgment in the court below, from which the defendant estate appeals.

The account filed by the claimant against the estate was:

To amount included in an indorsement of $1,963.-96 made on a certain promissory note, with mortgage collateral, executed by deceased, and delivered by him to the claimant, bearing date

July 12, 1890 — .................................$288 84

To costs in case of claimant against Debrix Miller,

and expense of the same......................... 58 80

To interest........................................ 34 08

In the statement of the claim it is alleged,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calkins v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Stebbins v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Huntington v. WellingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Bice v. Marquette Opera-House Building Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barbour v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1933
  2. Quick v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Cokely v. Kelly-Mitchell Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API