Legal Opinion

Stebbins v. Dean

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1890PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Case. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This suit was originally brought by 10 plaintiffs, as heirs at law of Horace Beers, deceased, against Alice M. Beers, the widow of said Horace, in 1866. The declaration alleges that Horace died in 1859, seised of certain lands therein described, the title-deeds to which have not been recorded; that he left no direct heirs, but left a widow, Alice; that she destroyed the deeds, and afterwards obtained the title in her own name; that some years afterwards she sold the same to one Fish, who bought in good faith, and in ignorance of plaintiffs’ rights; that therefore they have no remedy against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. The United States v. James and John G. Daniel, Executors of Beverly Daniel, Late U. S. MarshalSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  3. Leggate v. MoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Cartwright v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Dayton v. FargoMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jones v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Cochran Timber Co. v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Chase v. BoughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Deeg v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State ex rel. Baeder v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API