Legal Opinion

Quick v. Raymond

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Jackson; Peck, J. Bill by Lucy Quick and others against Jane E. Raymond, executrix of the last will and testament of Mahlon H. Raymond, deceased, to declare a foreclosure’ decree satisfied, and to enjoin further proceedings thereunder. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The following statement of facts, set out in the brief of defendant’s counsel, is substantially correct:

“Isaac C. Quick, in his lifetime, gave to Dr. 'Raymond his promissory note for <$4,000, payable in two years, with interest at 6 per cent. To secure the payment thereof, Quick and his wife gave Raymond a mortgage upon certain lands. Afterwards Quick died, and, as nothing had been paid on the note and mortgage, Raymond commenced a foreclosure in chancery. The bill for the foreclosure of the mortgage was taken as confessed by all the defendants, and on or about the 17th of January, 1893, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. BiglyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Cook v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Tower v. DivineMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Bryant v. Estate of RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Miner v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Board of Trustees of the General Retirement System v. Ren-Cen Indoor Tennis & Racquet ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Titus v. CavalierMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Wettlaufer v. AmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Chausse v. Bank of GarlandUtah Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API