Legal Opinion

Barbour v. Thomas

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 6, 1933No. 6035, 6036PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

The Detroit Bankers’ Company, hereafter referred to as the holding company, is a corporation for pecuniary profit, chartered under the general laws of the state of Michigan. It was not chartered as a banking institution. It was the registered owner of all of the capital stock of the First National Bank-Detroit, hereafter called the bank, except the qualifying shares of directors, when the bank was placed in the custody of a conservator, and later when a receiver was appointed. The Comptroller has decided the necessity for, and levied, a stock assessment of 100 per cent,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Lucking v. SchramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Nettles v. SottileSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Abramson v. Delrose, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API