Legal Opinion

Bice v. Marquette Opera-House Building Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Marquette. (Stone, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Long, 'J.

On August 4, 1890, tbe defendant company entered into a contract with Wilson & Moore by which they were to erect for defendant an opera-house building for tbe sum of -$45,000, to be completed by July 1, 1891. The contract provided that should tbe contractors at any *25time refuse- or neglect to supply sufficient material of the proper quality, of fail in any respect to prosecute their work with promptness and diligence, or fail in the performance of any of the agreements on their part, such failure being certified by the architect, the owners should be .at liberty to supply the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Calkins v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Michigan Slate Co. v. Iron Range & Huron Bay RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Boyer v. SoulesMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bryant v. Estate of RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cokely v. Kelly-Mitchell Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Kirk v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API