Legal Opinion

Agin v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1967No. 40967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

There is some similarity between parts of some of the grounds stated in appellants’ application for rehearing before the commission and parts of some of the statements of law in appellants’ brief on appeal in this court. Such a casual similarity does not, however, meet the requirements of Section 4903.10, Revised Code, which, in pertinent part, provides :

“Such application shall be in writing and shall set forth specifically the ground or grounds on which the applicant considers said order to be unreasonable or unlawful. No party shall in any court urge or rely on any ground for reversal,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Reading v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Chester Township v. Power Siting CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Forest Hills Utility Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. City of Struthers v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API