Legal Opinion

City of Struthers v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1970No. 69-715PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee Public Utilities Commission urges that the city’s application for rehearing, filed with *3the commission, was not in conformity with the mandatory requirements of R. C. 4903.10 that “such application shall be in writing and shall set forth specifically the ground or grounds on which the applicant considers said order to be unreasonable or unlawful.” Because of such failure, the commission claims a want of jurisdiction by this court.

The city’s application for rehearing sets forth, in essence, the following grounds for rehearing: (1) The order of the commission is arbitrary and not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Agin v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Charley's Tour and Transp., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Schultz v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Application of Charley's Tour and Transp., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. RichmondAshtabula Municipal Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API