Forest Hills Utility Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoRRigan-, J.
The assorted factual patterns presented to this court in these causes have a common issue by virtue of B. C. 4903.13, requiring us, upon a consideration of the record, to determine whether the orders of the Public Utilities Commission are reasonable and lawful.
*51I.
First in order is case No. 71-791, an appeal from final orders of the commission establishing sewer and water rates and the application for authority to issue securities.
Appellant urges as its proposition of law No. I that the commission’s determination of the statutory rate base is unreasonable and unlawful.
In the ease of Cleveland…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Agin v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Logan Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- Radio Relay Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Forest Hills Utility Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Mohawk Utilities, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Forest Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.