Legal Opinion

Forest Hills Utility Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1972No. Nos. 71-265, 71-791 and 72-125PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoRRigan-, J.

The assorted factual patterns presented to this court in these causes have a common issue by virtue of B. C. 4903.13, requiring us, upon a consideration of the record, to determine whether the orders of the Public Utilities Commission are reasonable and lawful.

*51I.

First in order is case No. 71-791, an appeal from final orders of the commission establishing sewer and water rates and the application for authority to issue securities.

Appellant urges as its proposition of law No. I that the commission’s determination of the statutory rate base is unreasonable and unlawful.

In the ease of Cleveland…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Agin v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Logan Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Radio Relay Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Forest Hills Utility Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Mohawk Utilities, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Forest Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API