Legal Opinion
Lane v. Davis
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1964No. Civ. 27488PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, J.
On April 1, 1957, appellant sued in a single cause of action for a real estate broker’s commission. Demur*61rers to the first complaint and a second complaint which was in two causes of action, were sustained, the latter being sustained without leave to amend. An appeal was taken by appellant, and the judgment entered upon the order sustaining the demurrer was affirmed as to the first cause of action and reversed as to the second cause of action, with instructions to the trial court to grant plaintiff leave to amend. (Lane v. Davis, 172 Cal.App.2d 302 [342 P.2d 267].) The remittitur was filed on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- O'DAY v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Lane v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Neustadt v. SkernswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Hsu v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Good v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Holder v. Sheet Metal Worker's International Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Breacher v. BreacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.