Legal Opinion

Lane v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1959No. Civ. 23591PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after defendants’ demurrer to his second amended complaint, which seeks to recover a real estate brokerage commission, was sustained without leave to amend.

The defendants were owners of a certain theatre building in Pasadena. The plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, was orally engaged to secure a purchaser for this property; if successful, he was to receive a 5 per cent commission. The oral agreement was entered into during December of 1955. Subsequently, through plaintiff’s efforts, the Salvation Army Corporation became interested…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Peters Grazing Association v. LegerskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Super 7 Motel Associates v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Zimmerman v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. American Home Insurance v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Philips Medical Capital, LLC v. Medical Insights Diagnostics Centers, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API