Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1940No. L. A. 17296PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the dismissal of an action under the provisions of section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground that the cause had not been brought to trial within five years from the time the plaintiff in said action had filed, its complaint in the Superior Court, and on the further ground that the plaintiff had failed to prosecute the action with due diligence. An alternative writ issued and a demurrer to the petition was interposed by the respondent Superior Court.

From the petition it appears that on August 5, 1931, Crown Body Corporation,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Superior Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Mercantile Investment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Allyne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Krasnow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Weeks v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. J. C. Penney Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hayashi v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Smith v. Adventist Health System/WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API