Mannweiler v. LaFlamme
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IAVERY, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment rendered for the defendants on the plaintiffs’ complaint seeking a permanent injunction to enforce a restrictive covenant to prevent the defendants from constructing more than one house on a lot. The dispositive issue is whether all of the lots in the subject development, including those of the plaintiffs and the defendants, were subject to restrictive covenants that prevented any owner from subdividing an existing lot and creating additional building lots.
The following facts are necessary for the resolution of this appeal. In 1927, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Hooker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Whitton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Contegni v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Demorais v. WisniowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Grovenburg v. Rustle Meadow Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Jepsen v. CamassarConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Prime Locations of CT, LLC v. Rocky Hill Development, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Mannweiler v. LaFlammeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.