Legal Opinion
Mannweiler v. LaFlamme
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 14, 2001No. AC 20166PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendants, Charles E. LaFlamme, Robert S. LaFlamme and David Apicella, appeal from the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Gordon B. Mannweiler, Arminda P. Murtha and William Boies, after a remand to the trial court to consider the defendants’ special defense relating to the Marketable Title Act (act), General Statutes § 47-33b et seq.1 The trial court found that the act did not apply and rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In Mannweiler v. LaFlamme, 46 Conn. App. 525, 526-34, 700 A.2d 57, cert, denied, 243 Conn.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Schulz v. SyvertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Halpern v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Clean Corp. v. FostonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Stepney Pond Estates, Ltd. v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Johnson v. SourignamathConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005