Legal Opinion

Ruppel v. Clayes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeCULLEN, J.

This is a suit for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by respondent, plaintiff below, as the result of negligence of appellant, defendant below. A trial before the court and a jury resulted in a verdict for plaintiff and against defendant in the sum of $6,000. Defendant appeals.

Defendant complains that the court erred in permitting plaintiff’s counsel, over defendant’s objection, to tell the jury in his opening statement that he expected to show that defendant was under the influence of liquor at the time of the accident in question, after defendant’s counsel had…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunning v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. State v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. Baumier v. AntiauMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Terre Haute Electric Co. v. KieleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Steele v. GoosenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. McKay v. Delico Meat Products Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. McGarvey v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Burrows v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API