Legal Opinion

Terre Haute Electric Co. v. Kieley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1904No. 4,871PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Erom Vigo Circuit Court; James E. Piety, Judge. Action by Anna M. Kieley as administratrix of tbe estate of Albert H. Kieley, deceased, against tbe Terre Haute Electric Company. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

Tbis action is brought for the benefit of tbe widow and next of kin of Albert H. Kieley, deceased, who is averred to have left a widow and two children, aged two and seven years, respectively, who were dependent upon him. The administratrix avers in her complaint that ap*182pellant was a corporation operating a system of electric street railways in the city of Terre Haute, and also an electric interurban railway between sáid city and the town of Brazil; that among the cars used by appellant was one for the removal of cinders from its power-house, which was known as car “Ho. 15”; that its cars,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McFarlan Carriage Co. v. PotterIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Mullen v. BowerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Hunt v. ConnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. TackettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hambleton v. Aja Granite Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  2. Ruppel v. ClayesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Union Traction Co. v. ElmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Town of Sellersburg v. FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Bingham v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API