Legal Opinion

In Re Discipline of Drakulich

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1995No. 21321PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Springer, J.:

This is an automatic appeal from findings and recommendations of a hearing panel of the Northern Nevada Disciplinary *1557Board of the State Bar of Nevada. The panel found that, on numerous occasions, appellant, attorney Victor G. Drakulich, shared with an individual named Harold Hall a portion of the attorney’s fees appellant earned for representing clients who had been referred to appellant by Hall. The panel further found that appellant’s actions violated a number of the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct.

Based upon these findings, the panel recommends that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gruber v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1890
  3. In Re Discipline of StuhffNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Merced County Department of Human Resources v. Ismael C.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Taylor v. OsbornWashington Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Gilman v. Nevada State Board of Veterinary Medical ExaminersNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Matter of Discipline of DrozNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. King v. St. ClairNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF CHRISTOPHER R. ARABIANevada Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Ricks v. DabneyNevada Supreme Court · 2008

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API