In Re Discipline of Drakulich
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Springer, J.:
This is an automatic appeal from findings and recommendations of a hearing panel of the Northern Nevada Disciplinary *1557Board of the State Bar of Nevada. The panel found that, on numerous occasions, appellant, attorney Victor G. Drakulich, shared with an individual named Harold Hall a portion of the attorney’s fees appellant earned for representing clients who had been referred to appellant by Hall. The panel further found that appellant’s actions violated a number of the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct.
Based upon these findings, the panel recommends that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Gruber v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1890
- In Re Discipline of StuhffNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Merced County Department of Human Resources v. Ismael C.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Taylor v. OsbornWashington Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Gilman v. Nevada State Board of Veterinary Medical ExaminersNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Discipline of DrozNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- King v. St. ClairNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF CHRISTOPHER R. ARABIANevada Supreme Court · 2021
- Ricks v. DabneyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.