Legal Opinion

Cook v. Port of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1891PublishedCited by 72 opinions

Multnomah county: L. B. Stearns, Judge. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

— This suit involves the constitutionality of an act of the legislative assembly of this state, entitled “An act to establish and incorporate the port of Portland, and to *581provide for the improvement of the Willamette and Columbia rivers in said port and between said port and the sea.” (Laws of 1891, 791.) This act in terms creates a separate district, with defined boundaries, which embraces substantially what was at the time of the passage the cities of Portland, East Portland, and Albina, and now the city of Portland, to be kown as the port of Portland, and the inhabitants thereof are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Wilson v. SalomonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Railroad Co. v. County of OtoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. City of San Francisco v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Cline v. GreenwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  5. State ex rel. Chouteau v. LeffingwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Straw v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API