Legal Opinion

United States v. Cleage

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1908No. 2,560PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

By an action in the District Court the United States sought to recover from Thomas Cleage certain taxes alleged to have accrued under Schedule A of the war revenue acts of June 13, 1898 (30 Stat. 448, 458, c. 448) and March 2, 1901 (31 Stat. 938, 942, c. 806 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 2286, 2300]). The petition was in two counts, and its allegations were all put in issue by the answer. By consent of the parties the trial was to the court without a jury. It resulted in a general finding for the defendant on the first count, and for the plaintiff on the second, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. EliasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Pomeroy's Lessee v. State Bank of Ind.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. Campbell v. BoyreauSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  5. Graham v. BayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1855

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Sioux City Stock Yards Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. St. Joseph Stockyards Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  3. Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Philadelphia Casualty Co. v. FechheimerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  5. United States v. Louisville & N. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API