United States v. Sioux City Stock Yards Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Iowa. For opinion beiow, see 162 Fed. 556. Before VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge, and RINER and AMIDON, District Judges.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.
This was a civil action to recover a penalty alleged to have been incurred under section 3 of the act of June 29,1906, c. 3594, 81 Stat. 608 (U. S. Cong). St. Supp. 1907, p. 919), known as the “28-Iiour Law.” The answer was practically a general denial, and the issues of fact were determined by the Circuit Court without the intervention of a jury, pursuant to a written stipulation of the parties. The trial resulted in a judgment for the defendant, which necessarily imported, although it did not expressly contain, a finding in the defendant’s favor. Error was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- St. Louis v. Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. LombardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Wilson v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Lahman v. Burnes Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Blumenthal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- G. Amsinck & Co. v. Springfield Grocer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.