Legal Opinion

United States v. Louisville & N. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1909No. 1,796PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky. For opinion below, see 156 Fed. 195. Before SEVERENS, Circuit Judge, and KNAPPEN and SANFORD, District Judges.

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action of debt brought by the United States in the District Court against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company to recover a penalty of $100 for the alleged violation of section 6 of the “Safety Appliance Act” of March 2, 1893 (Act March 2, 1893, c. 196, 27 Stat. 532, as amended by Act April 1, 1896, c. 87, 29 Stat. 85 [U._ S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3175]). The cause of action stated in the petition is that the defendant “hauled a car with interstate traffic over its line of railroad in and about Louisville, in the state of Kentucky, within the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. United States v. Baltimore & O. S. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  3. United States v. CleageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Illinois Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Low v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. Gruetter v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API