Legal Opinion

Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New York

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1934No. 7028PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, National City Bank of New York, in an action for damages suffered because of alleged wrongful refusal of defendant, Continental National Bank, to honor drafts drawn under its letter of credit and purchased by plaintiff. The Continental will for convenience be referred to as if it were sole defendant and appellant.

On April 12, 1929, the ease was submit-' ted to the District Court on a stipulation of facts, without any requests being made by 1 either party for findings of fact, general or special, or for a declaration of law…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
  5. South Utah Mines & Smelters v. Beaver CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Barclays Bank D. C. O. v. Mercantile National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Banco Espanol De Credito v. State Street Bank and Trust Company, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
  4. Kerr-Mcgee Chemical Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Crocker Commercial Services, Inc. v. Countryside BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API