Legal Opinion

Esko v. Lovvold

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when a utility pole, owned and maintained by defendants, upon which plaintiff was working broke and fell to the ground. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on a directed verdict.

At the time of the accident plaintiff was employed as a lineman by Cox Cablevision, which provides television programming by coaxial cable in Astoria, Oregon. Plaintiff’s principal duties consisted of installing and repairing cable on the top of utility poles, a task at which he had considerable experience. ①

Defendants own and operate a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McIsaac v. Northampton Electric Lighting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Yowell v. General Tire & Rubber CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hines v. Martel Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Wriglesworth v. DoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Brown v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. George v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Cain v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  5. Boothby v. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API