Esko v. Lovvold
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when a utility pole, owned and maintained by defendants, upon which plaintiff was working broke and fell to the ground. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on a directed verdict.
At the time of the accident plaintiff was employed as a lineman by Cox Cablevision, which provides television programming by coaxial cable in Astoria, Oregon. Plaintiff’s principal duties consisted of installing and repairing cable on the top of utility poles, a task at which he had considerable experience. ①
Defendants own and operate a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McIsaac v. Northampton Electric Lighting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Yowell v. General Tire & Rubber CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Hines v. Martel Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Wriglesworth v. DoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Brown v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- George v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Cain v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Boothby v. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.