Legal Opinion
Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 2009No. 08CA0134PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge WEBB.
In this personal injury action that raises questions of first impression concerning recovery of exemplary damages, defendants, Qwest Services Corporation and Qwest Corporation (collectively, Qwest), appeal the trial court's judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs, Andrew Blood (Blood) and Carrie Blood, and third-party defendant Public Service Company of Colorado, doing business as Xcel Energy (Xcel), and its denial of Qwest's post-trial motions.
We vacate the trial court's order increasing exemplary damages and remand for an evidentiary hearing on Blood's…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Qwest Services Corp. v. BloodSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- People v. GardnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Top Rail Ranch Estates, LLC v. WalkerColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Giduck v. NiblettColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bonidy v. Vail Valley Center for Aesthetic Dentistry, P.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.