Legal Opinion

Yowell v. General Tire & Rubber Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1971PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is a negligence action for damages resulting from personal injuries. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant based upon an involuntary nonsuit granted at the conclusion of plaintiff’s ease in chief.

Plaintiff was a sign builder, installer and repairer of 20 years’ experience. Defendant was engaged in the tire business and was the possessor of property upon which there was a large, almost square, illuminated plastic advertising sign mounted at the top of a single steel pole. Defendant engaged plaintiff’s employer to repair or replace the illuminated tubing in the interior of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Beaumont v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Shell Oil Company v. BlanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  3. Palenscar v. Michael J. Bobb, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Warner v. SynnesOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Repyneck v. TarantinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Boothby v. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hite v. Maritime Overseas CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1974
  3. Brown v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. George v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Yeatts v. Polygon Northwest Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API