Legal Opinion

George v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2000No. 9712-10258; CA A104584PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the allowance of summary judgment dismissing his claims for violation of the Employer Liability Act (ELA), ORS 654.305 et seq., and for negligence per se and common-law negligence. We conclude that: (1) Defendant is not subject to “indirect employer” liability under the ELA. (2) Defendant, either as a general contractor or a property owner, cannot be liable in negligence per se for alleged violation of certain workplace safety rules promulgated under the Oregon Safe Employment Act (OSEA), ORS 654.001 et seq. And (3) the “specialized contractor doctrine,”…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McAlpine v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Miller v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Woodbury v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Downs v. Steel and Craft Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Cain v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  4. Spain v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. E. Max Woodbury II v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API