Legal Opinion

Hines v. Martel Telephone Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1934No. 28949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This action sounds in tort, and arises out of an accident which occurred September 29, 1930. In the capacity of a telephone lineman at the time stated, plaintiff was in the act of climbing a telephone pole, which broke off under his weight and fell to the ground, causing the injuries in suit. In the district court, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, a verdict was instructed for the defendant, and from the order of that court overruling his, motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

At the time of this accident plaintiff, Hines, was in the employ of the defendant, Martel Telephone Company,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McIsaac v. Northampton Electric Lighting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. D'AlemberteSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  3. Broderick v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Dehning v. Detroit Bridge & Iron WorksNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lynch v. Saginaw Valley Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wood v. Kane Boiler Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Plock v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Schneider v. Village of ShickleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hatley v. MOBIL PIPE LINE COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Pearson v. SchulerNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API